Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Similarly, a historical review will assess all the historical records of scholarship chronologically while methodological review examines the research methods alone—collection of data, their critical analysis, interpretation, and research results, for example.
As a result, they can give you credit for your due diligence: you have done your fact-finding and fact-checking mission, one of the initial steps of any research writing. Search the Web of Science [a. This means identifying, summarizing and critically assessing past research that is relevant to your own work.
Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. You have written a research paper, an original paper in your area of specialization, without a literature review. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication.
Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective.
When you come to write up your findings, your literature review will therefore provide a crucial point of reference. Academic Skills Centre.
Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating.