Film vs digital debate
Listing off a slew of aspect ratios, he dismissed them all, preferring to take a more classic approach. There are still many compelling reasons to use film, though, if only for experimentation.
The desired values were all there in their beautiful negative interpretation. As an example, see the Leica year proposed by The Online Photographer a while back. No power or batteries needed. Though the film itself is costly, we have decades worth of old bodies and lenses available at very low prices, since so few people shoot film anymore.
You can change your focus in post-production. Cataloging and editing are both much easier with digital files.
Film vs digital movies comparison
Canon, Kodak vs. As you can see, Velvia 50 has very fine grain and has rich vibrant colors straight from the scan compared to the unedited JPEG from the Canon 6D. Dynamic ISO: the ability to modify ISO on the fly is a huge advantage over the static light response of film and offers a lot more versatility when light changes fast or unexpectedly. The final word on the film vs. There are still many compelling reasons to use film, though, if only for experimentation. Keep up the good work! Film is also impractical to transport in great quantities, being heavy and bulky, slow to switch in the camera, etc. There are not very many exotic digital cameras, few manufacturers venture out of the compact — DSLR standards. One of the most important steps in post-processing a digital image to replicate film is to carefully control the light and the highlights. Daniel J. A Guest Post by Rebecca Lily With the comeback of film over the last few years, many digital photographers are questioning whether or not to make the switch.
One of the most important steps in post-processing a digital image to replicate film is to carefully control the light and the highlights. Though high-end digital has pretty much caught up, film still holds its own in image quality, in particular in terms of resolution and dynamic range with negatives, slide film having a notoriously bad range.
It would be interesting to see how true Velvia film would hold up against an in-body Fujifilm digital simulation, or VSCO simulation.
Because there is always the unknown.
Film vs digital debate
What do you think? But which is truly best? For some reason, in all these debates, we seem to lose sight of the fact that neither tool is inherently superior. This is where post-processing comes in, and where I personally found my tipping point that made me stick with digital. You can edit your images directly on the camera. Depending on your viewpoint, this is either an advantage or disadvantage. Not the energy. Show them to your friends, family, fellow photographers. Film Nikon FM2 Nikkor 50mm 1. I was able to understand the meaning of my life. Is it worth adding a Contax to the arsenal and shooting weddings on film? If you shoot black and white, you can fairly easily do your own printing, something which many people love and a very different way of relating, on an almost physical level, to your pictures. How do they make you feel? I still shoot both, but the bigger love is with film. Though the film itself is costly, we have decades worth of old bodies and lenses available at very low prices, since so few people shoot film anymore.
This was originally posted on our Instagram instagram. It costs no money to take many pictures, encouraging to shoot more, experiment more and get mileage faster.
based on 85 review