Examining totalitarianism through the soviet union
It should be clear that Margalit in no way wishes to deny the value of justice.
Taylor, Charles. Arendt, Hannah. Ironically, the more philosophical Arendt sought to be, the more opaque she became.
Isaiah Berlin on Liberty Throughout his career, Isaiah Berlin devoted a considerable amount of attention to the question of totalitarianism. This ideal involves a notion of democracy as the constant and unanimous participation of the citizens of an ideal state in the acting out of the general will, thereby realising true democratic citizenship.
Fromm proposes that the anxiety in isolated individuals, produced by the great burden to succeed demonstrably and without secured grace in the eyes of God, led to severe social and psycho-pathologies. By treating people in accordance with justice, society denies them one sound reason to feel rejected from humanity, however much they may actually feel that way…. In sum, I started out to write a brief history of a stage in kremlinology and found myself writing something approaching an intellectual history of the Cold War. On the other hand, she certainly knew that members of this highly intellectual grouping related in highly positive terms to the Origins and were instrumental in recommending the book and advancing its exceptional acceptance. For Fromm, this was especially true of the German lower middle class, which he held to be strongly influenced by modern individualistic ideologies. If their critics hold the high ground, they have inflated the importance of secondary or even epiphenomenal notions and properties to an unrealistic station. The liberal democratic thought of Benjamin Constant and Alexis de Tocqueville in France, as well as John Stuart Mill in England, were instrumental in developing this political tradition to a philosophical apogee. The tendency of historicism and of related views to support the revolt against civilization may be due to the fact that historicism itself is, largely, a reaction against the strain of our civilization and its demand for personal responsibility. The extent to which the state should promote it remains an important question. Of course, she did not owe anyone any explanation on this matter of how she used her right of personal and public association. Some theorists and proponents understood -the new kind of state that seemed to be appearing as merely a ferocious reworking of the states of the old regime, to eliminate their executive weakness and social reformism. While years passed, European Christians were aware of the dangers of Totalitarianism and connected past conflicts to a Communist regime which then sparked fear and created an anti totalitarian census that defined Europe in the early Cold War. For Berlin, this totalitarian development of positive liberty was not an aberration, but a logical conclusion. For Margalit, even if a society is just institutionally and procedurally, it may nonetheless denigrate its citizens and subjects in diverse institutional ways, thereby rendering it formally civilized but indecent. The Concept of the Political.
The latter trend he saw not just in totalitarian society, but in capitalist democracies as well, and as requiring concerted social activism. This fascinating collection of intellectuals, which attracted Arendt and Bluecher, has been dubbed the New York intellectuals in a book with the same title.
The reigning, dominant political discourse in the United States could not have been more favorable. In the West, people on the Left tended to be reluctant to call the Soviet Union totalitarian, in large part because of the damage such a harsh categorization of the Soviet Union did to all revolutionary and even seriously reformist politics.
It is only natural that the thrust of this argument is employed almost exclusively against that section of the Left which refused to be penned in by the prohibitions to think past the limits of liberal, capitalist democracy. This concept is vitally important since it serves as the analytic foundation for a belief structure that presumes to be the key to understanding, no more and no less, the main issues of the twentieth century.
The State and Revolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London, Here Popper broadens his critique of totalitarianism by indicting major figures of the Western philosophical tradition, notably Plato, Hegel and Marx. The concept and the theory, as we have already pointed out, hold that the previous century centers on the battle between freedom and tyranny. A self-reinforcing causal mechanism became increasingly apparent, especially among the middle classes of modern capitalist society, as the new form of Christianity helped to create the modern individual, and was in turn strengthened by the resultant socio-economic psychology of modern European society. Furthermore, Arendt claimed that the Eichmann case confirmed her view that totalitarianism represents a gross perversion of fundamental civilised and ethical values in favour of mass bureaucracy, propaganda and thoughtlessness. As much a work of intellectual history as political philosophy, The Origins of Totalitarianism jarred many due to its indictment of European civilization during a period of post-war reconstruction. Afterword These days, civilization continues to defend itself against the two-pronged onslaught of the two worst evils facing it: totalitarianism and terror. Talmon furthermore holds it to be characterised by historical determinism and a notion of a single comprehensible truth in political life. In general, the Soviet Union responded to the external threat with arguably reasonable defensive strategic requirements. Moreover, it is, of course, relevant to cite the indisputable historical truth that the major military confrontation of the twentieth century involved the central contribution of the Communist Soviet Union to the military destruction of the war machine of Nazi Germany. Nor does this fear by itself make for an adequate theory of political power.
based on 94 review