Analysis of keirsey temperament sorter
He had, at one point, associated intuition with introversion, but he moved away from that view before arriving at his final theory, or a misunderstanding of Jung's use of the term "concrete" in Psychological types.
Unfortunately, because the same letter is used in both systems, the misunderstanding may not be recognised. The attentive Protectors and the expressive Providers are the two role variants. The third ring: directive proactive versus informative reactive The third ring distinguishes between people who generally communicate by informing others versus people who generally communicate by directing others.
Keirsey's comments on typology In Please Understand Me, Keirsey makes the association between Jungian typology and temperament. For example, Linda Berens' temperament research institute has adapted the concept of temperament to more closely fit with the theory of psychological types, and the criticisms above, say, of ISTP descriptions do not apply to TRI's descriptions.
Keirsey temperament sorter vs myers briggs
It is clear, from Psychological Types, that in Jung's final theory, Sensing and Intuition had been completely separated from Extraversion and Introversion, and there was no confusion in his own mind. The one word which captures the unique style of INTPs is architect - the architect of ideas They excel at organizing, facilitating, checking, and supporting. Do you see yourself as basically a hard-headed Guardians are concrete and organized scheduled. Entertainers are the informative reactive Artisans. ISTPs can use general principles to bring order out of confused data and meaning out of unorganised facts" p91 Gifts Differing In fact, Isabel Briggs-Myers description is in some ways opposed to Keirsey's: whereas he describes them as action-driven, she states that they are "great believers in economy of effort". Action for the ISTP is more gratifying if it is born of impulse than purpose.
Their most developed intelligence operation is arranging. Their greatest strength is diplomacy. So why did Keirsey make the association that he did? In his works, Keirsey used the names suggested by Plato: Artisan iconicGuardian pisticIdealist noeticand Rational dianoetic.
Analysis of keirsey temperament sorter
People who are cooperative pay more attention to other people's opinions and are more concerned with doing the right thing. It is clear, from Psychological Types, that in Jung's final theory, Sensing and Intuition had been completely separated from Extraversion and Introversion, and there was no confusion in his own mind. The attentive Crafters and the expressive Promoters are the two role variants. Their most developed intelligence operation is improvising. When people reflect and focus on their internal world, they are introspective. In his works, Keirsey used the names suggested by Plato: Artisan iconic , Guardian pistic , Idealist noetic , and Rational dianoetic. Which is the greater fault: a being indiscriminate Are you a person that is more a routinised than whimsical The informative roles are Entertainers informative Artisans , Conservators informative Guardians , Advocates informative Idealists , and Engineers informative Rationals. Do you prize more in yourself a a strong sense of reality b a vivid imagination Their most developed intelligence operation is constructing. The attentive Healers and the expressive Champions are the two role variants. Individuals who prefer more overt action [saying and doing] during covert acting [conception and perception] observing or introspecting are described as expressive, whereas people who prefer more covert acting during overt [or inactive] action are described as attentive.
Entertainers are the informative reactive Artisans. Some associative words for "expressive": active, chatty, conversant, effusive, fluent, profuse, verbose. In writings do you prefer a the more literal There is no mention, whatsoever, in the ISTP description, of the introverted dominant function: introverted Thinking.
However, Carl Jung used the word sensation when describing people who prefer irrational perception of the sensory experience, whether abstract or concrete.
based on 103 review